[analog-help] Requests vs. Page Views

[Jeremy Wadsack]

Successful requests for pages should be close to Webtrend's "Page View", depending on your definition of page in analog. Also webtrends is notorious for imprecise statistics so I would expect a margin of error.

You can define pages using the PAGEINCLUDE command in your analog.cfg. The default is */,*.htm,*.html. If you are running server-side scripting language of some kind you may want to add one of the following:

	PAGEINCLUDE *.asp
	PAGEINCLUDE *.as?x
	PAGEINCLUDE *.pl
	PAGEINCLUDE *.php
	PAGEINCLUDE *.cfm
	PAGEINCLUDE *.jsp
	PAGEINCLUDE *.jsf

Hope that helps,
 
Jeremy Wadsack
Seven Simple Machines


> -----Original Message-----
> From: analog-help-bounces at lists.meer.net [mailto:analog-help-
> bounces at lists.meer.net] On Behalf Of Esposito, Richard
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 12:21 PM
> To: analog-help at lists.meer.net
> Subject: [analog-help] Requests vs. Page Views
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Is one of these below Analog stats equivalent to what Webtrends calls
> "page views" (a hit to any file classified as a page)?
> 
> Successful server requests:  17,727 Requests
> Successful requests for pages 17,632 Requests for pages
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------
> |  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
> |    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
> |
> |  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
> |  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
> |  Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------