[analog-help] The next 'best' analyzer...?

[Dimitri Maziuk]

Per Jessen wrote:
...
> Maybe introducing autoconf into the build?

Please don't: applications that use libtool tend to only build on "GNU's
Not Unix". Besides, if the code is written in $language -- as opposed to
GNU$language, most of autoconf's checks are unnecessary cruft. Perhaps
if someone rewrites analog in gunk (aka gnuc) it'll need an automagical
check if c compiler can create excutables and isn't missing stdio.h. But
as it stands now, it ain't broken to begin with.

Dima