[analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ? (was: The next 'best' analyzer...?)

[Per Jessen]

Dimitri Maziuk wrote:

>>
>> Alright, then perhaps not autoconf itself, but the general "edit the
>> header file" configuration method is a little dated, so some kind of
>> assisted config tool would come in handy.
> 
> My take on it, if one can't edit the defines in Makefile/header file,
> then one probably won't be able to create a usable analog config file
> either. Or apache config file -- so that person probably shouldn't try
> to run a webserver anyway.

autoconf is used by 99.9% of the software I use.  That alone seems to be
a strong indication of its distinct advantages over hand-editing a pile
of header files. 

If it was up to me, analog-7.0 would be autoconf'ed.



/Per Jessen, Zürich