[analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ? (was: The next 'best'analyzer...?)

[Per Jessen]

Aengus wrote:

> Per Jessen <per at computer.org> wrote:
>> autoconf is used by 99.9% of the software I use.  That alone seems to
>> be a strong indication of its distinct advantages over hand-editing a
>> pile of header files.
>>
>> If it was up to me, analog-7.0 would be autoconf'ed.
> 
> What exactly is it that you need to edit in Analog header files?
> 
> Describing anlghead.h as "a pile of header files" sounds like
> sophistry to me.

I wasn't specifically referring to analogs header files, just the
general principle. 


/Per Jessen, Zürich