[analog-help] The next 'best' analyzer...?

[Jackie Meese]

On Aug 31, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Per Jessen wrote:
> Per Jessen wrote:
>> User-modifications are the first signs of a beginning fork. Why not a
>> 6.01 release instead?
>> Has anyone collected these user-mods into a combined patch?
> Found one:
> http://iddl.vt.edu/~jackie/analog/analog-6.01beta1.patch

I actually have a more complete collection of the windows changes and  
my changes as well as a tarball.

Links from http://iddl.vt.edu/~jackie/analog/

Putting this together, I was wondering if there should be some kind  
of slightly more organized system for collecting these, or if we even  
need one, as the changes are minor tweaks at this point mostly. A  
simple patch could do the trick. Mostly the code has been in windows  
by Chris, and myself for the unix based stuff, so it may be overkill  
at this point. There is a sourceforge page, and I'm guessing Stephen  
has that, but no code in CVS or any releases on the page either. As I  
said, I'm not sure if that not necessary, as this is less of a fork  
and more of maintenance at this point.

j.
----
Jackie Meese, Systems Administrator & eLSDI Team Leader
Institute for Distance and Distributed Learning, Va Tech
Phone: 231-3682                         http://www.iddl.vt.edu/
3026 Torgersen Hall                     Mail Code: 0445
I am, and always will be, an idiot.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.meer.net/pipermail/analog-help/attachments/20071115/60c5e532/attachment-0001.html