[analog-help] Re: Ann: 6.0.3 Release

[Chris Tilley]

My principal reservation over the entire thing is in wanting to know how many people would actually find it useful to posess this information in the first place. From a personal perspective it's of effectively no use,b ut if there is genuine demand then sure, why not.I concur with everything Aengus said about the browser setup, my research has show the same information and therefore I have to post the question that if a 32-bit browser running on a 64-bit operating system is identifying itself in the same was a 32/32, how useful is it because the accuracy of the system is never going to really be that great (with the ironic exception being MSIE).So, what is it you specifically need?A CPU Report?orA 64-bit Browser use Report?orA 64-bit Operating System Report?"Paul Wade" <paul-Ay7UAFYAMvIwjfG2/bKSFEEOCMrvLtNR at public.gmane.org> wrote in message news:loom.20071009T174016-772 at post.gmane.org...> Chris,>> Blimey. Maybe M$ will make the Windows versions for Vista and Server 2008> different in the end, in the same way XP is 5.1 and Windows Server 2003 is> 5.2, because the products share a similar relationship. Who knows, it > would> seem a sensible option, though there's little definite evidence as yet...>> The data you've included looks like downloads of the updated Analog from > your> site. As you'll see I didn't download using Vista x64, but am running it > on> such as I said. I downloaded using a 32-bit OS on a processor using the > AMD64> architecture and you're correct there is no record of this. However, I > wonder> what would happen if I were to download again using a 64-bit OS? Since you> might post details of my IP and software environment I'm a little nervous> about doing so, despite my connection being proxied anyhow. As I say I > have> seen other log analysers record the difference between x86 and x64 > operating> systems and I'd be surprised if Analog can't. That would be a reason to > switch> if you're right!>> Really this is for academic interest though, but with the move to 64-bit> computing on the Windows platform over the next few years it would seem a > good> feature to have. As for Safari it's easy enough for me to scan down the> Browser Report looking for instances of Safari and noting those on the > Windows> platform instead of Mac OS.>> Paul>> +------------------------------------------------------------------------> |  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:> |    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help> |> |  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html> |  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives> |  Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general> +------------------------------------------------------------------------> 

> To: analog-help at lists.meer.net> From: paul at astrologywizard.com> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 19:01:08 +0000> Subject: [analog-help] Re: Ann: 6.0.3 Release> > Chris,> > Here are details of my user agent, which I tested here:> > http://whatsmyuseragent.com/> > You might like to note the WOW64 bit!> > Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; SLCC1; .NET CLR > 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; Media Center PC 5.0)> > Should do it I reckon...> > Paul> > > +------------------------------------------------------------------------> | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:> | http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help> |> | Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html> | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives> | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general> +------------------------------------------------------------------------
_________________________________________________________________
The next generation of MSN Hotmail has arrived - Windows Live Hotmail
http://www.newhotmail.co.uk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.meer.net/pipermail/analog-help/attachments/20071011/dcfa6661/attachment.html