[analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ? (was: The next'best'analyzer...?)

[Pamela Marsh]

Melissa - Do you know anything about this?


-----Original Message-----
From: analog-help-bounces at lists.meer.net on behalf of Per Jessen
Sent: Sun 9/2/2007 6:30 AM
To: analog-help at lists.meer.net
Subject: Re: [analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ? (was: The next'best'analyzer...?)
 
Dimitri Maziuk wrote:

> Per, just because all those lignux people use autoconf doesn't mean
> you should, too. 

I happen to be one of those too :-)

> On one end of the spectrum there's Linux kernel where 
> lots of things need to be configured pre-compilation. It's not using
> autoconf because autoconf can't handle that level of complexity. On
> the other end there's analog with one header file 

Analog today has six header files.

> which you don't even 
> need to touch 99% of the time. It's not using autoconf because there's
> nothing there to autoconf.

How about if I'd like to use a locally available version of e.g.
libpcre, libgd, libz and libpng?  As a sysadmin surely that has crossed
your mind.



/Per Jessen, Zürich

+------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list:
|    http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help
|
|  Analog Documentation: http://analog.cx/docs/Readme.html
|  List archives:  http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives
|  Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 3677 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.meer.net/pipermail/analog-help/attachments/20070904/cafa60c3/attachment.bin