[analog-help] Re: analog autoconf'ed ?
Dimitri Maziuk
dmaziuk at bmrb.wisc.edu
Tue Sep 4 13:54:26 PDT 2007
On Tuesday 04 September 2007 11:59:04 Per Jessen wrote:
>
> Dima, should we ever get that far, don't feel obliged to use the
> autoconf'ed version.
Heh. I hope you'll be kind enough to give me the choice -- most of them
are "run ./configure or go lose yourself in twisty maze of little shell
scripts, all alike".
The point I'm trying to make, autoconf, like most other goodies, brings in a
whole new level of complexity and a new source of failures. The smart thing
to do is to carefully consider the actual (not perceived) benefits vs. the
costs. With autoconf the main cost is well known build failures on non-GNU
platforms/with non-GNU build tools (where analog currently builds just
fine -- last I checked).
Dima
--
Dimitri Maziuk
Programmer/sysadmin
BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
More information about the analog-help
mailing list